Posted 8/23/01 Concerns about NSPís latest powerline proposal To the editor: NSPís failed 1996 Chisago Powerline application cost electric ratepayers $537,880 in shredded paper and wasted state administrative man hours in Minnesota alone, according to the counsel for the MN Environmental Quality Board. NSP executives evidently enjoyed that stunt so much theyíre eager to play it again, this time before the MN Public Utilities Commission, seeking a certificate of need for a new Chisago Powerline. This new version doubles the carrying capacity (815 MVA) of the original at a time when state energy planners are crying ìCalifornia Crisisî at the prospect of a drawdown to Minnesota electric resources and reserves. The MN PUC is expected to give NSP a favorable hearing. Its newest member, Phyllis Rhea, championed NSPís last gasp attempt to resurrect the Chisago Powerline last summer, even after three-fourths of the Minnesota parties to mediation walked out after discovering utility fraud. While the deck has always been stacked against the public, the first Chisago Powerline was virtually pre-approved until the EQB hearings demonstrated that NSPís need claims were manufactured, it remains to be seen how the other four PUC commissioners will rule on continued claims of need. It is becoming increasingly difficult for NSP to seize public and private land under eminent domain given the controversy in the south metro over NSPís plans to service an expanded megamall and given Wisconsinís recent approval to build the 345,000 volt powerline from Duluth to Wausau. Mark Oberg Lindstrom ©Post Review