Letter to the Editor, Posted: 12/15/04
By Pete Nelson, State Representative District 17B
The November state budget forecast is out and it shows that while we have made significant progress in solving our budget problems, we still have a little work left.
State economists predict a $700 million budget deficit for 2006-2007, plus inflation. The cause of the deficit is not a problem of too little money coming in. In fact, revenues are predicted to be up over the next two years. The problem is ñ and this is what creates the deficit ñ spending is predicted to increase by 7.6 percent, more than twice the rate of revenue increase.
Most of the increase comes from skyrocketing government health care costs. We will spend a whopping $1.4 billion more on health care in the next two years than we spend now ($7.2 billion in the 2004-2005 budget).
Thatís a 20 percent increase! At this rate, we would have to double income taxes every eight years just to keep up. Clearly, we cannot sustain this kind of spending.
There is no shortage of suggestions on how we should solve this problem. Some say we need to raise the gas tax, which has been set since the late 1980s. Others say a higher cigarette tax would help solve the budget problem and discourage kids from smoking. Still others say we should not cut spending at all and raise everyoneís income tax by 5 percent. It is too soon to rule out any possible solution and raising the gas tax may get serious discussion this year, but raising the income tax is almost entirely out of the question. Even Senate Democrats, who are usually not shy about their desire for higher taxes, say they donít have the votes to take more money from your paycheck.
I donít support higher income taxes and if some of the most liberal elected officials in the state agree with me, it is a safe bet that your income taxes wonít go up this year.
Lost in the news of another deficit is some very good news about the current state budget. When legislators set the budget in 2003 we faced a projected deficit of $4.2 billion. We chose not to raise taxes and made some tough spending decisions. Not everyone was happy. But look at what happened: The 2004-2005 biennium ñ which started with a huge deficit ñ will end with a $495 million surplus. Thatís quite a turn around in just two short years.
It is easy to think we should use the current yearís surplus to pay down next yearís deficit, but state law requires us to spend the money is a certain way. First, we must fund the budget reserve to $650 million and rebuild the stateís cash flow account to $350 million.
With what is left, about $118 million, we are required to buy back some of the education shifts used to balance previous budgets.
Like 2003, 2005 will be a long, busy and contentious session. Groups on all sides of every issue will do everything they can to make their voices heard. I encourage you to contact me with your thoughts, ideas, questions and concerns. You can contact my by phone at (651) 296-5377 or 1-800-296-7463. You can also email me at rep.peter.nelson@house.mn. Or, if you're in St. Paul, feel free to drop by my office at 433 State Office Building, right across the street from the State Capitol.
©ECM Post Review
6448 Main Street
North Branch, MN 55056
Telephone: 651-674-7025
Fax: 651-674-7026
E-mail: editor.postreview@ecm-inc.com