Click for North Branch, Minnesota Forecast scotsman-peach.png

Friday night football

This THURSDAY, Oct. 9, the Rush City Tigers football team travels to Esko for a 7 p.m. game. The North Branch Vikings are at home against Robbinsdale Cooper on Friday, Oct. 10, at 7 p.m. Look for results at the Post Review's Scoreboard Plus (above) after the games.
recipeexchange.jpg

Post Review Poll

What's your favorite of the upcoming holidays?
 
mycapture-graduate-160x60.jpg
quickpost-160x60.png
prvideotag.jpg
Current Advertisers
FleetGo
Budget season brings more cuts for NB school district PDF Print
By Patrick Tepoorten

North Branch School District Financial Director Randi Johnson kicked off another budget season by saying, “Today’s a sad day in the North Branch School District.” Sad because administration spent the work day informing staff that the 2008 - 2009 budget season was likely to bring the largest round of budget cuts since 2005.

Having previously made the decision not to pursue an operating levy in 2008, at the Feb. 28 work session the school board got down to the business of making do with what is available. According to Johnson, it’s going to take $2.9 million in cuts to square next year’s operating budget. With the exception of the 2005 - 2006 budget, which suffered a $3.5 million adjustment, this is the deepest round of cuts. But, where those cuts were offset by the use of $1.3 million in leftover fund balance - leaving only $2.1 to be actually cut - the district has no such luxury this time around. In fact, after years of using the fund balance to offset deficits to the tune of $7.4 million over the last five years, it is depleted to the point that the district must now make adjustments to maintain its target balance of $1 million.

The district is projected to require $2.5 million in operating budget cuts, but unlike previous years, it will also require $400,000 in cuts to replenish the fund balance. The district did plan to have a healthy fund balance by the end of this fiscal year, it’s severe reductions in promised special education aid from the state that has left the fund balance almost a half-million short. According to Johnson, with the reduction, the increases to special education funding last year at the state level will only amount to about $50,000 more this year than last.

Other challenges the district faces is a projected $200,000 loss due to a special education tuition billing system change, also at the state level, an increase of its diesel fuel budget of $55,000 this year, a significant decrease in the number of students who qualify for free and reduced lunch, and a 60-student enrollment decline this school year.

Of major concern for the district is the declining enrollment. Johnson, who stated that the district has “lived” off of enrollment growth for years, said the pattern of declining enrollment, which the district does not see changing in the short term, puts the district “in a whole new dimension” budget-wise.

As is her custom, Johnson used conservative figures to project next year’s needs. It is possible the projected deficit could be reduced by the end of the fiscal year in June.

Like in previous years, district administration will begin the process of cutting using a site-based formula that will focus the cuts where deficits are being generated through decreasing enrollment. Last year the middle school bore the brunt of cuts. For the upcoming budget season, it is likely the biggest cuts will be to the primary school budget.

Staff input session have been scheduled for early March, and the district will allow public comment on the pending cuts at a special meeting on April 17 at the Sunrise River School. The board is expected to take action on cuts on April 24, and adopt a budget by June 30.

Historically, the district has been forced to adjust downward $17.3 million from its annual budgets since 2003 - 04. Those cuts have been offset by the $7.4 million in fund balance over the same time frame, leaving $9.9 million in actual cuts.
Comments (1)add comment
A District Taxpayer: ...
Patrick, I really have to wonder a bit about the repeated use of the word "Cut" in this article. In looking at the annual financial statements that the District provides on it's website (http://www.northbranch.k12.mn.us/education/dept/dept.php?sectiondetailid=5814) you will notice that Total Revenues for the District in 2003 were $31.8 million and in 2007 they were $37.0 million or 16.6% higher than they were in 2003. Granted some of this growth in revenue may have to do with the passage of the school bonding referendum but it is still a respectable increase in revenue, particularly when you consider that the 2007 Average Daily Membership (student population) is virtually flat from 2003 to 2007. Only in Government Speak can a 16.6% or $5.2 million increase in revenue and spending be portrayed as “Cuts” of $17.3 million.

If I go into my annual performance review at work hoping for a 7% increase in my pay but come to find out that I am only getting a 2% increase, I don’t come home and tell my wife that I just had my pay cut by 5%, even if it means I won’t be able to purchase that HDTV I had planned on getting with my 7% raise. No one thinks that way outside of government. That may be part of the reason why the district has not been able to get their operating levy passed. They have been telling us for the past 5 (or is it 10) years that they have been slashing their budgets year after year after year and lo and behold even in the face of all that slashing and cutting after all is said and done their revenues (and expenditures) have some how managed to grow by nearly 17%.

The District is fond of showing us the trend of “Cuts” they have been forced to make over the past five years, and even the 5 year trend in how much they really should be receiving in operating levy funds, however when it comes to spelling out the trend in their actual expenditures over the past 5 years, that graph seems to be missing. If the District really wants taxpayers to take them seriously they need to quit with this pretense that all they have been doing is cutting their expenses for the past five years because not many of us believe that (for good reason) and as a result we tend to have our doubts about all else the District tells us as well.
1

March 04, 2008

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >
John Hirsch
whodoesit_button.png
button.gif
Associated Bank
Cambridge Medical Center
Cambridge State Bank
Counter