An alternative to Superior Silica Sands

To the editor

It is my understanding that there was another proposal on the table besides the one by Superior Silica Sands.

Chisago County HRA/EDA was willing to purchase that piece of property outright, market it and sell it.

No worry about silica sand in the air, no excess traffic, less wear and tear on our roads.  Sounds like a win-win situation.

This would help with our ESSBY debt.  Am I missing something here?  To me, it seems like a no-brainer.

I live on Highway 95. I thought I was used to truck traffic. Lately it has increased with trucks transporting sand to Tiller Corp.  Add another 250+ trucks to our highway and the downtown area, and the county offer looks excellent.

Our narrow highway downtown, with no expansion available, is a disaster-waiting-to-happen.

Fall back and use common sense.

Superior Silica will be back at the table when permits are received in February or before. Don’t let this mistake be your legacy.

Doylene Voligny 

North Branch

 
up arrow